Speech IEP Goals: 29 Examples and How SLPs Measure Them

Estimated reading time: 17 minutes

Speech IEP goals are measurable annual goals in a student’s IEP that target communication needs: producing speech sounds, speaking fluently, using a healthy voice, understanding and using language, building vocabulary, communicating socially, and using AAC. The IEP team writes them with the school speech-language pathologist (SLP), and they can sit in an IEP where speech-language services are the student’s only special education service. This guide covers the IDEA rules, what a speech-only IEP contains, 29 example goals by area, how SLPs measure progress, and what caseloads mean for practice time.

Executive Summary

Speech or language impairment is the second-largest IDEA category: 18% of the 8.2 million students ages 3 to 21 served in 2024-25, after specific learning disabilities at 31% (OSEP). Students in other categories, such as autism, can also receive speech-language services as a related service.

The constraint is time. ASHA’s 2026 Schools Survey reports a median caseload of 50 students per full-time school-based SLP and an average of 21 hours a week of direct intervention: split evenly, about 25 minutes of the SLP’s direct time per student per week. Most practice has to happen between sessions, with teachers and families.

What Are Speech IEP Goals?

Speech IEP goals are measurable annual goals that target a communication need resulting from a student’s disability, written from the present levels and delivered through speech-language services.

IDEA defines a speech or language impairment as “a communication disorder, such as stuttering, impaired articulation, a language impairment, or a voice impairment, that adversely affects a child’s educational performance” (34 CFR 300.8(c)(11)). OSEP has stated that “educational performance” is “not limited to academic performance” (Letter to Clarke, 2007). Speech goals are part of the IEP’s “measurable annual goals, including academic and functional goals” (34 CFR 300.320); the general method is in the complete guide to IEP goals.

Speech as a Related Service or as Special Education

IDEA lists speech-language pathology services as a related service, including “provision of speech and language services for the habilitation or prevention of communicative impairments” (34 CFR 300.34(c)(15)). Special education also includes “speech-language pathology services, or any other related service, if the service is considered special education rather than a related service under State standards” (34 CFR 300.39(a)(2)(i)).

That matters for eligibility. A child who needs only a related service is not a child with a disability under IDEA, unless state standards treat that service as special education (34 CFR 300.8(a)(2)). Where they do, a student can have a speech-only IEP, whose only special education service is delivered by the SLP. Wisconsin’s Information Update Bulletin 24.02 (2024) is one example: specially designed instruction for communication needs “can be provided by a speech-language pathologist.”

What a Speech-Only IEP Contains

A speech-only IEP has the same required parts as any IEP under 34 CFR 300.320:

• Present levels describing the need with data and its effect in the general curriculum (see PLAAFP examples).
• Measurable annual goals for each communication need.
• How progress will be measured and when it will be reported.
• The services, with “the anticipated frequency, location, and duration” (34 CFR 300.320(a)(7)), such as 2 sessions of 30 minutes a week in class.
• Accommodations and supports for the classroom, such as extra response time for a student who stutters.

How to Write Speech and Language IEP Goals

Use the four components of any measurable goal: condition, target behavior, performance criterion and timeline. For communication goals, the condition sets the difficulty: a sound in single words, in sentences, or in conversation.

Weak goal: “Liam will improve his articulation.” Measurable goal: “By the annual review, during classroom read-alouds and conversation, Liam will produce /r/ correctly in 80% of opportunities across 3 consecutive probes, from a baseline of 20% in single words, as measured by SLP probes and teacher checks.”

Write language goals from the curriculum where you can. ASHA’s Practice Portal on spoken language disorders describes school interventions as “curriculum-based, addressing language needs within the context of the curriculum.”

Speech IEP Goals Bank: 29 Examples

These are original examples written for this guide. Adapt each from the student’s own baseline, name the real setting, and open with the timeline (“By [date of the next annual IEP review],”), left out below.

Articulation and Phonology Goals

1. Sound in words: Given picture cards, [Student] will produce /s/ in initial, medial and final positions of words with 80% accuracy across 3 sessions, as measured by SLP trial data.
2. Sound in sentences: When reading sentences aloud, [Student] will produce /r/ correctly in 80% of opportunities across 3 sessions, as measured by SLP probes.
3. Phonological pattern: In spontaneous speech, [Student] will produce final consonants (reducing final consonant deletion) in 75% of words in a 50-word sample, as measured by SLP language samples.
4. Self-correction: When [Student] misproduces a target sound in conversation, [Student] will self-correct with no more than one cue in 4 of 5 opportunities, as measured by SLP and teacher checks.

Fluency Goals

ASHA’s fluency goal framework centers on “reducing tension and effort in communication” and on communicating “effectively in various speaking situations”; none of its goals is to eliminate stuttering.

1. Using a strategy: During structured conversation, [Student] will use a taught strategy (easy onset, light contact) during moments of stuttering in 4 of 5 sessions, as measured by SLP observation.
2. Participating in class: [Student] will volunteer at least one answer per class period in 4 of 5 periods, as measured by teacher tally.
3. Self-advocacy: [Student] will explain stuttering and request one accommodation (such as extra time) to a teacher in 2 of 2 planned opportunities, as measured by SLP records.

Voice Goals

1. Loudness for the setting: In class and at recess, [Student] will use a voice level matched to a visual scale in 4 of 5 observed periods, as measured by teacher and SLP checks.
2. Vocal care: [Student] will use two taught voice care habits (sipping water, not yelling) on 4 of 5 days, as measured by a self-monitoring chart checked by the SLP.

Receptive Language IEP Goals

Receptive language IEP goals target understanding: following directions, answering questions and making sense of words and sentences heard in class. ASHA’s Practice Portal describes language as both receptive and expressive (listening, reading and watching on one side; speaking, writing and signing on the other), and its page on spoken language disorders lists difficulty with listening comprehension, such as understanding questions and following directions, and with complex sentences among the signs.

1. Directions: Given 2-step classroom directions with a basic concept (before, after, under), [Student] will follow them in 8 of 10 trials, as measured by SLP trial data.
2. Wh- questions: After listening to a grade-level passage, [Student] will answer who, what, where, when and why questions in 80% of trials, as measured by SLP data.
3. Figurative language: Given idioms from class texts, [Student] will explain the meaning from context in 4 of 5 trials, as measured by work samples.
4. Complex sentences: Given spoken sentences with “because”, “if”, “unless” or a passive verb (“The bus was passed by the truck”), [Student] will choose the picture or answer that matches the meaning in 8 of 10 trials, as measured by SLP trial data.
5. Directions with a condition: When given a classroom direction with a condition (“If you finished, put your paper in the tray; if not, keep working”), [Student] will follow the part that applies in 4 of 5 opportunities, as measured by teacher and SLP tally.
6. Describing words: When an adult describes an object by its features (“Find the one that is round and that you can eat”), [Student] will select it from a field of 4 in 8 of 10 trials, as measured by SLP trial data.

Expressive Language IEP Goals

Expressive language IEP goals target using language to speak, sign or communicate through AAC: building sentences, using grammar, telling events in order and finding the right word. ASHA’s Practice Portal on spoken language disorders lists word-finding difficulties, problems with complex sentences and narratives that lack cohesion among the signs of a spoken language disorder; goals should name the real classroom task where the student needs the skill.

1. Sentence structure: When describing a picture, [Student] will use complete sentences with correct subject-verb agreement in 80% of sentences, as measured by SLP language samples.
2. Narrative retell: After a story, [Student] will retell it with character, setting, problem, events and solution in 4 of 5 retells, as measured by a narrative rubric.
3. Explaining a process: In science or math, [Student] will explain the steps of a process in sequence using transition words in 4 of 5 opportunities, as measured by teacher and SLP checklists.
4. Longer utterances: During play or a shared activity, [Student] will use utterances of three or more words in at least 50% of utterances in a 50-utterance sample, from a baseline of [baseline], as measured by SLP language samples.
5. Describing an object: Given a familiar object or picture, [Student] will describe it with at least three features (group, use, appearance) in 4 of 5 trials, as measured by SLP data.
6. Linking ideas: When explaining an answer or telling about an event, [Student] will join ideas with “because”, “so” or “when” at least 5 times in a 50-utterance sample, as measured by SLP language samples.

Vocabulary Goals

1. Curriculum words: Given 10 words from the current unit, [Student] will define each and use it in a sentence in 8 of 10 words, as measured by curriculum-based probes.
2. Categories: Given a category, [Student] will name 5 members and one shared feature in 4 of 5 trials, as measured by SLP data.
3. Word-learning strategy: When meeting an unknown word in text, [Student] will use context clues or a word part to state a likely meaning in 4 of 5 opportunities, as measured by work samples.

Pragmatics and Social Communication Goals

Broader social skills goals are in social emotional IEP goals. To set a baseline for these goals, see our guide to pragmatic language assessment.

1. Topic maintenance: In a conversation with a peer, [Student] will stay on topic for 4 exchanges in 4 of 5 conversations, as measured by SLP observation.
2. Clarifying: When [Student] does not understand, [Student] will ask a clarifying question in 4 of 5 opportunities, as measured by teacher and SLP tally.
3. Adjusting to the listener: When explaining a game to a younger student and to an adult, [Student] will change word choice and detail for each listener in 3 of 4 role-plays, as measured by SLP checklist.

AAC Goals

AAC goals target using the system across settings and partners. More are in AAC IEP goals, with core vocabulary and data collection, and in IEP goals for autism.

1. Navigating the device: [Student] will navigate to the correct page of their speech-generating device to request or comment in 8 of 10 opportunities across settings, as measured by event recording.
2. Combining symbols: During class routines, [Student] will combine 2 symbols to make a message (for example “more paint”) in 4 of 5 opportunities, as measured by SLP and teacher data.

How SLPs Measure Speech IEP Goals

The IEP must state how progress will be measured and when it will be reported (34 CFR 300.320(a)(3)). Speech goals typically combine three kinds of data:

Trial data show learning; probes show whether the skill is usable. ASHA’s Practice Portal on speech sound disorders describes “facilitating carryover of sound productions at increasingly challenging levels” and “encouraging self-monitoring of speech and self-correction of errors.” Templates for trial and probe data are in IEP data collection sheets.

Carryover and Practice Frequency

The SLP “guides a student’s IEP or 504 team in making determinations regarding the frequency, intensity and duration of speech-language services,” and ASHA notes that “student outcomes may be improved if a flexible approach to scheduling and service delivery is adopted” (ASHA, school-based service delivery). Options include short, frequent sessions and pull-out followed by in-class practice.

Collaboration With Classroom Teachers

ASHA describes pull-out sessions, classroom-based services in which “SLPs work closely with teachers and classroom staff,” co-teaching, and consultative services in which “the SLP works with the student’s teachers, staff, and family.” The choice of a classroom-based model “is based on student need and collaboration with the teacher.” Three practical moves:

• Share the target. A one-line card for the teacher: the sound or structure, the cue to use, what counts as correct.
• Borrow the curriculum. Use unit vocabulary and class texts in sessions so practice transfers.
• Collect one classroom data point a week. A teacher check turns generalization from a guess into data.

Funding and Staffing

CEIS as summarized by TEA. ASHA’s caseload and workload page states that “ASHA does not recommend a specific caseload number” and recommends “a workload analysis approach.”

Common Mistakes District Leaders Make

1. Measuring only in the speech room. Mastery in trials is not mastery in class.
2. Ignoring the curriculum. ASHA describes school language intervention as curriculum-based.
3. Setting minutes by habit. “30 minutes twice a week” for everyone ignores need and intensity.
4. Ignoring academic effects. A language disorder that affects reading needs goals for that need.
5. Fluency goals that promise “no stuttering.” Target strategies and participation.
6. Staffing by caseload count alone. ASHA recommends a workload approach.
7. Leaving teachers out of carryover. Minutes are not repetitions.

Questions District Leaders Should Ask

• What is the median caseload and workload of our SLPs, by campus?
• How many minutes of practice a week does a typical student with speech goals get?
• What share of speech goals include a generalization measure outside the speech room?
• Do classroom teachers know each student’s speech target and cue?
• How many students with language goals also have reading or writing needs addressed in their IEP?

Frequently Asked Questions

What does an IEP for speech look like?

It has the same parts as any IEP: present levels describing the communication need with data, measurable annual goals, how progress is measured and reported, the speech-language services with their frequency, location and duration, and classroom accommodations. In states that treat speech-language services as special education, those services can be the only special education the IEP provides.

Can a speech only IEP have academic goals?

Yes, when the communication disorder affects academic work. IDEA requires goals for each need that results from the disability, and “educational performance” is not limited to academics. A language impairment that affects reading comprehension or written retells can justify reading IEP goals or writing goals. Wisconsin’s 2024 guidance says IEP goals are “not dependent on the student’s disability label.” The team decides who delivers each service.

What are some examples of speech goals for children?

Producing /s/ or /r/ correctly in sentences, self-correcting sound errors in conversation, using an easy onset during moments of stuttering, following 2-step directions, answering wh- questions about a story, retelling a story in sequence, defining unit vocabulary, staying on topic with a peer, and combining symbols on an AAC device. Each needs a baseline, a criterion and a measurement method.

What is the difference between receptive and expressive language?

Receptive language is understanding what others say, sign or write; expressive language is using words, signs, writing or AAC to communicate. ASHA describes language as both receptive (listening, reading, watching) and expressive (speaking, writing, signing). A student can struggle with one or both, so an IEP can include receptive language goals, such as following directions with a condition, and expressive language goals, such as building longer sentences, each with its own baseline.

How many minutes of speech services should a student get?

IDEA sets no minimum. The IEP states the anticipated frequency, location and duration of services (34 CFR 300.320(a)(7)), and ASHA says the SLP guides the team on frequency, intensity and duration. As a benchmark, the 2026 ASHA survey figures (21 direct hours, median caseload of 50) work out to about 25 minutes of SLP direct time per student per week if split evenly. Students served in groups can have more minutes in their IEP, because they share sessions.

Can AI help write speech and language IEP goals?

It can help turn a baseline and a target into clear, measurable wording, or generate practice word lists from unit vocabulary. Never enter a student’s name or identifying details, follow district policy, and keep clinical decisions with the SLP and the IEP team. The ChatGPT for teachers guide covers safe use.

Related Resources

• IEP Goals: How to Write Measurable Goals
• IEP Goals for Autism
• Social Emotional IEP Goals
• IEP Data Collection Sheets
• PLAAFP Examples
• ChatGPT for Teachers: A Practical Guide

Conclusion

Speech IEP goals are easy to write and hard to reach, because the skill has to move from a structured trial to a classroom conversation. The goals that get there name the setting, measure generalization as well as accuracy, and come with a plan for practice between sessions. With SLP time spread this thin, that plan decides the outcome.

Sources: 34 CFR 300.8, Child with a disability; 34 CFR 300.34, Related services; 34 CFR 300.39, Special education; 34 CFR 300.320, Definition of individualized education program; OSEP, Letter to Clarke on educational performance, March 2007; Wisconsin DPI, Information Update Bulletin 24.02; U.S. Department of Education, OSEP, 2024-25 Static Tables (Part B Child Count & Educational Environments); ASHA, 2026 Schools Survey: SLP Caseload and Workload Characteristics Report; ASHA Practice Portal, Caseload and Workload; ASHA, School-Based Service Delivery in Speech-Language Pathology; ASHA Practice Portal, Speech Sound Disorders; ASHA Practice Portal, Spoken Language Disorders; ASHA Practice Portal, Treatment Goals for Fluency Disorders; TEA, Requirements of Coordinated Early Intervening Services.

Join the 2027 Special Education Pilot

A speech target becomes a habit only through repetitions between sessions, and an SLP’s week leaves less than half an hour of direct time per student. Telo AI is being adapted for students with IEPs: patient, 1-on-1 practice aligned to each student’s IEP goals, including speaking practice. We are inviting districts to shape it with us in a 2027 pilot.

Apply to pilot Telo AI in your Special Education program